Posts Tagged ‘President George Bush’

‘Miss Me Yet?’: Mystery Surrounds Who Paid for George Bush Billboard

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

George W. Bush

‘BIOB’: McCain Slams ‘Blame it On Bush’ Syndrome in Obama Address

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

John McCain

Bush: Jump to Conclusions on Ft. Hood Shooting suspect; he is a Jihadists

Friday, November 13th, 2009

George W. Bush

‘Disgusting’: Krauthammer Condemns Obama’s Blame Bush Routine

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Charles Krauthammer

Obama’s Appearances at Fundraisers Outpace Presidents Bush and Clinton

Monday, October 26th, 2009

Just nine months into his presidency, President Obama has appeared at 23 Democratic fundraisers, including the two he attended Tuesday night, compared with George W. Bush, who did six political fundraisers, and Bill Clinton, who did five, during their first year in office.

When it comes to making appearances at political fundraisers, President Obama apparently can’t say no — especially when compared to his two predecessors.

Just nine months into his presidency, Obama has appeared at 23 Democratic fundraisers, including the two he attended Tuesday night, according to Mark Knoller of CBS News, who keeps a detailed log of presidential activities.

By comparison, George W. Bush attended six political fundraisers and Bill Clinton went to five during their first year in office.

“That’s a clear disparity,” said Pete Sepp, vice president for policy and communications at the National Taxpayers Union.

But when it comes to raking in the cash for fellow party members, Bush appears to be the fundraiser-in-chief.

He raised $48 million in those six fundraisers, while Obama raised $21 million in his first 20.

Obama’s whirlwind fundraising tour is far from finished. This week he’s going to a rally for New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine, who’s locked in a tight race with Republican challenger Chris Christie; he’ll visit Boston to raise money for Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, who is up for re-election in 2010; and he’ll be at a fundraiser for Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, who is facing a tough re-election next year.

Next week, leading up to the Nov. 3 election, Obama will campaign for R. Creigh Deeds, who trails Republican Bob McDonnell in the race for Virginia governor. 

There’s plenty at stake for Obama, who is the Democrats’ top fundraiser. Dollars aren’t materializing as much as expected for Democrats. And, two weeks before off-year elections, Democrats are facing the prospect of losing the hard-fought gubernatorial race in Virginia and perhaps even in New Jersey. They are contests that depend on the Democratic base and to a certain degree are shaping up as a test of Obama’s political strength.

It’s not just this year’s races that are at issue but also the broader state of the Democratic Party — from cash-flow to enthusiasm — heading into next year. In the 2010 elections, Democrats will try to defend their majorities in Congress and seek to pick up governor’s seats in many states.

The party that controls the White House typically loses congressional seats in a president’s first midterm election. Obama wants to avoid the fate of Clinton, who like the current president swept into office with youthful energy, only to see his party lose control of Congress two years later.

Obama is calculating that he can’t afford criticism from the Democratic Party’s base supporters that he’s not helping candidates. But there also are risks to full-throttle campaigning.

“If governors and members of the House and Senate come to the conclusion that Obama’s personal support is not transferrable or that his supporters have not remained mobilized, the impact of his personal charisma will be seen as more limited than it was a year ago,” said Kenneth Sherrill, a political science professor at Hunter College in New York.

“All in all, he gets more credit for making a public effort than for sitting on the sidelines and watching Democrats at risk fend for themselves,” Sherrill said.

The circumstances were quite different for Obama’s predecessors.

To continue reading click here.

Rep. Pence Impresses Crowd with George W. Bush Impersonation

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

 Mike Pence

Obama WH adopts Bush indefinite-detention position

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

By: Ed Morrissey

Remember when the Left scoffed at the argument from George W. Bush that claimed the authorization to use military force allowed the executive branch to hold captured terrorists indefinitely, without criminal trial?  Bush’s opponents screamed about human rights and due process, and claimed that Bush had abused his power.  Those critics included Barack Obama, who regularly castigated the Bush administration for its failure to provide his idea of due process to detainees at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere, as well as blasting Bush for his argument that he didn’t require Congress to act to maintain that power.

Now?  Change you can believe in, baby:

The Obama administration has decided not to seek new legislation from Congress authorizing the indefinite detention of about 50 terrorism suspects being held without charges at at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, officials said Wednesday.

Instead, the administration will continue to hold the detainees without bringing them to trial based on the power it says it has under the Congressional resolution passed after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, authorizing the president to use force against forces of Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

In concluding that it does not need specific permission from Congress to hold detainees without charges, the Obama administration is adopting one of the arguments advanced by the Bush administration in years of debates about detention policies.

Click here to keep reading.

For the Left, war without Bush is not war at all

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

By: Byron York President Bush_Flags
Chief Political Correspondent

Remember the anti-war movement? Not too long ago, the Democratic party’s most loyal voters passionately opposed the war in Iraq. Democratic presidential candidates argued over who would withdraw American troops the quickest. Netroots activists regularly denounced President George W. Bush, and sometimes the U.S. military (“General Betray Us”). Cindy Sheehan, the woman whose soldier son was killed in Iraq, became a heroine when she led protests at Bush’s Texas ranch.

That was then. Now, even though the United States still has roughly 130,000 troops in Iraq, and is quickly escalating the war in Afghanistan — 68,000 troops there by the end of this year, and possibly more in 2010 — anti-war voices on the Left have fallen silent.

No group was more angrily opposed to the war in Iraq than the netroots activists clustered around the left-wing Web site DailyKos. It’s an influential site, one of the biggest on the Web, and in the Bush years many of its devotees took an active role in raising money and campaigning for anti-war candidates.

In 2006, DailyKos held its first annual convention, called YearlyKos, in Las Vegas. Amid the slightly discordant surroundings of the Riviera Hotel casino, the webby activists spent hours discussing and planning strategies not only to defeat Republicans but also to pressure Democrats to oppose the war more forcefully. The gathering attracted lots of mainstream press attention; Internet activism was the hot new thing.

Fast forward to last weekend, when YearlyKos, renamed Netroots Nation, held its convention in Pittsburgh. The meeting didn’t draw much coverage, but the views of those who attended are still, as they were in 2006, a pretty good snapshot of the left wing of the Democratic party.

The news that emerged is that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have virtually fallen off the liberal radar screen. Kossacks (as fans of DailyKos like to call themselves) who were consumed by the Iraq war when George W. Bush was president are now, with Barack Obama in the White House, not so consumed, either with Iraq or with Obama’s escalation of the conflict in Afghanistan. In fact, they barely seem to care.

 Click here to read entire article.